Under-Display Camera vs Notch: Which Do Users Really Prefer?

Under-Display Camera vs Notch: Which Do Users Really Prefer?

Smartphone design has always been a balance between aesthetics and functionality. As rumours of a truly full-screen iPhone 20 continue to circulate, one key question stands out:
do users actually prefer an under-display camera, or are visible cutouts still acceptable?

The Case for Under-Display Cameras

Under-display cameras promise:

  • A cleaner, uninterrupted screen

  • A more immersive viewing experience

  • A futuristic look that feels “next-generation”

For many users, especially those who value design, a cutout-free display is visually appealing and feels like the natural evolution of smartphones.

The Reality of Current Technology

Despite the appeal, under-display camera technology still has limitations:

  • Reduced image clarity

  • Lower light sensitivity

  • Inconsistent performance compared to traditional cameras

For everyday use — video calls, selfies, face recognition — reliability often matters more than appearance.

Why Many Users Accept Notches and Cutouts

While notches and punch-holes were controversial at first, most users have adapted. Over time, they became less noticeable and were seen as a reasonable trade-off for better camera quality and biometric performance.

Apple’s Dynamic Island is a good example of turning a limitation into a functional feature.

What Do Users Really Want?

For many users, the ideal solution isn’t simply “no cutout” — it’s no compromise.
A truly full-screen iPhone will only succeed if it delivers the same or better camera quality, security, and everyday usability as current models.

Would you choose a perfectly clean screen even if camera quality took a small hit?
Or is performance still the top priority?

Back to blog